Determining Factors Affecting Mother's Decisions in Providing and Selecting Infant Formula Using Data Mining - Decision Support System Collaborative

Main Article Content

Dwi Utari Iswavigra Iswavigra
Bella Gusniar
Miranda Ika Vania

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries with a population of around two hundred million people, ranking fourth after the United States in the list of the most populous countries in the world. According to data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), the birth rate is projected to reach 4.45 million people in 2022, an increase of 0.22% from the previous year, which was 4.45 million people. According to the 2007 Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS), the rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Indonesia was only 32%. Factors such as maternal health, infant health, and formula milk promotions influence mothers' decisions to use formula milk. The availability of numerous formula brands complicates the decision-making process, with each brand offering different nutritional claims. This study employs the K-Medoids clustering algorithm to analyze factors affecting mothers' choices in formula feeding and the TOPSIS method to determine the most suitable formula for infants aged 0-6 months. The research involves clustering data from a questionnaire distributed to 100 mothers in the Solo Raya region into five categories: maternal health, maternal employment, formula promotion, infant health, and breastfeeding education. Results indicate that maternal health is the most influential factor, followed by infant health, maternal employment, and formula promotion. Lack of breastfeeding education does not significantly influence formula choice. The TOPSIS method, applied to evaluate 10 formula brands against six nutritional criteria, identifies Lactogen 1 as the best formula for infants aged 0-6 months with a highest value of 2.777104826. This data-driven approach provides a clear, systematic method for selecting an appropriate formula based on specific nutritional needs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Iswavigra, D. U. I., Bella Gusniar, & Miranda Ika Vania. (2024). Determining Factors Affecting Mother’s Decisions in Providing and Selecting Infant Formula Using Data Mining - Decision Support System Collaborative. Jurnal Informasi Dan Teknologi, 6(3), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.60083/jidt.v6i3.593
Section
Articles

References

[1] M. A. Biro, G. A. Sutherland, J. S. Yelland, P. Hardy, and S. J. Brown, “In-Hospital Formula Supplementation of Breastfed Babies: A Population-Based Survey,” Birth, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 302–310, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.2011.00485.x.
[2] Y. Huang, J. Labiner‐Wolfe, H. Huang, C. J. Choiniere, and S. B. Fein, “Association of Health Profession and Direct‐to‐Consumer Marketing with Infant Formula Choice and Switching,” Birth, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 24–31, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1111/birt.12025.
[3] K. Parry, E. Taylor, P. Hall‐Dardess, M. Walker, and M. Labbok, “Understanding Women’s Interpretations of Infant Formula Advertising,” Birth, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 115–124, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1111/birt.12044.
[4] “AOAC Official Method 2012.13Labeled Fatty Acids Content in Milk Products, Infant Formula, and Adult/Pediatric Nutritional Formula,” Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1093/9780197610145.003.4081.
[5] B. Lönnerdal, “Infant formula and infant nutrition: bioactive proteins of human milk and implications for composition of infant formulas,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 712S-717S, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071993.
[6] W. N. Hamilton, “Factors Influencing Maternal Decision-Making on Infant Feeding Practices,” Infant Feeding - Breast versus Formula, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.91325.
[7] C.-Y. Fu, X.-J. Tang, L.-P. Pan, H.-Y. Jin, J.-F. Yao, and L.-Z. Wang, “Exclusive breastfeeding rate and related factors among mothers within maternal health WeChat groups in Jiaxing, Zhejiang province, China: a cross-sectional survey,” International Breastfeeding Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13006-022-00521-5.
[8] M. B. Regasa, T. Refera Soreta, O. E. Femi, and P. C. Ramamurthy, “Development of Molecularly Imprinted Conducting Polymer Composite Film-Based Electrochemical Sensor for Melamine Detection in Infant Formula,” ACS Omega, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 4090–4099, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03747.
[9] S. M. F. D. Syed Mustapha, “Predictive Analysis of Students’ Learning Performance Using Data Mining Techniques: A Comparative Study of Feature Selection Methods,” Applied System Innovation, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 86, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/asi6050086.
[10] D. U. Iswavigra, L. Endriani Zen, Okfalisa, and H. Hanim, “Marketing Strategy UMKM Dengan CRISP-DM Clustering & Promotion Mix Menggunakan Metode K-Medoids”, jidt, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45-54, Feb. 2023.
[11] E. T. Ena Tasia and M. Afdal, “Perbandingan Algoritma K-Means Dan K-Medoids Untuk Clustering Daerah Rawan Banjir Di Kabupaten Rokan Hilir,” Indonesian Journal of Informatic Research and Software Engineering (IJIRSE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 65–73, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.57152/ijirse.v3i1.523.
[12] A. Leis et al., “K-medoids clustering of hospital admission characteristics to classify severity of influenza virus infection,” Dec. 2022, doi: 10.22541/au.167056743.33133902/v1.
[13] B. Mrugalska, “Clustering of Cities based on their Smart Performances: A Comparative Approach of Fuzzy C-Means, K-Means, and K-Medoids_supp2-3333753.docx”, doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3333753/mm1.
[14] L. Zahrotun, U. Linarti, B. H. T. Suandi As, H. Kurnia, and L. Y. Sabila, “Comparison of K-Medoids Method and Analytical Hierarchy Clustering on Students’ Data Grouping,” JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 446, May 2023, doi: 10.30630/joiv.7.2.1204.
[15] H. Amin, “CLUSTERING ANALYSIS OF ADMISSION OF NEW STUDENTS USING K-MEANS CLUSTERING AND K-MEDOIDS ALGORITHMS TO INCREASE CAMPUS MARKETING POTENTIAL,” Tech-E, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 43–56, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.31253/te.v7i1.2264.
[16] G. Clark, A. Vistoso Monreal, N. Veas, and G. E. Loeb, “Perspective Chapter: Highly Structured Data Collection and Predictive Diagnostic Assist Algorithms in Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine,” Decision Support Systems (DSS) and Tools [Working Title], Dec. 2023, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1003849.
[17] P. Trivedi, J. Shah, R. Čep, L. Abualigah, and K. Kalita, “A Hybrid Best-Worst Method (BWM)—Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Approach for Prioritizing Road Safety Improvements,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 30054–30065, 2024, doi: 10.1109/access.2024.3368395.
[18] M. Zaman, F. Ghani, A. Khan, S. Abdullah, and F. Khan, “Complex Fermatean fuzzy extended TOPSIS method and its applications in decision making,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 9, p. e19170, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19170.
[19] S. Chakraborty, “TOPSIS and Modified TOPSIS: A comparative analysis,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 2, p. 100021, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2021.100021.
[20] Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS as an effective and powerful Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method for subjective judgements in selection process,” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, May 2023, doi: 10.56726/irjmets36629.
[21] N. Beridze and G. Janelidze, “Organizing Decision-Making Support System Based Multi-Dimensional Analysis of the Educational Process Data,” Journal of ICT, Design, Engineering and Technological Science, vol. 4, no. 1, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.33150/jitdets-4.1.1.
[22] A. P. Joshi and B. V. Patel, “Data Preprocessing: The Techniques for Preparing Clean and Quality Data for Data Analytics Process,” Oriental journal of computer science and technology, vol. 13, no. 0203, pp. 78–81, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.13005/ojcst13.0203.03.
[23] G. Gledec, M. Horvat, M. Mikuc, and B. Blašković, “A Comprehensive Dataset of Spelling Errors and Users’ Corrections in Croatian Language,” Data, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 89, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/data8050089.
[24] H. Yu, P. Sang, and T. Huan, “Adaptive Box–Cox Transformation: A Highly Flexible Feature-Specific Data Transformation to Improve Metabolomic Data Normality for Better Statistical Analysis,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 94, no. 23, pp. 8267–8276, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00503.
[25] Y. Yao et al., “Normalization Approach by a Reference Material to Improve LC–MS-Based Metabolomic Data Comparability of Multibatch Samples,” Analytical Chemistry, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04188.
[26] L. Teixeira, I. Eleutério, M. Cazzolato, M. Gutierrez, A. Traina, and C. Traina-Jr., “KluSIM: Speeding up K-Medoids Clustering over Dimensional Data with Metric Access Method,” Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 73–84, 2024, doi: 10.5220/0012599900003690.