Kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berkala: Prediksi Sikap Masyarakat Terhadap Telemedis Selama Pandemi COVID-19

Main Article Content

Tiar Anindya Putri

Abstract

Telemedicine can provide routine care services without the risk of contracting Covid-19 in online way in the government's policy for social restrictions and adaptation of new habits stages. This study was intended to assess attitudes in the direction of telemedicine at some stage in periodical social restrictions in Indonesia, then examine the general public's willingness to use the service within the future, and also examine the extent to which respondent have changed their minds about the service. This study uses two statistical analysis approaches. The first approach was a cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study conducted among adults aged over 19 years using social media networks. Then the second approach is Ordered Logistic Regression models on two questionnaire items for the dependent variable, specifically predicting willingness to apply telemedicine within the future and predicting changes in thoughts about telemedicine. Sixty-four percent of respondents agree and strongly agree that they need to use telemedicine during the periodical social restriction period of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, despite the availability of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, 46.92% of respondents tend to still like to go to clinics or hospitals. A total of 24.64% of respondents were hesitant to go to a clinic or hospital, and 28.44% of respondents were hesitant to go to a clinic or hospital. This makes telemedicine in Indonesia not yet considered a necessity, but is still considered the first solution that can be done on a periodic basis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Putri, T. A. (2022). Kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berkala: Prediksi Sikap Masyarakat Terhadap Telemedis Selama Pandemi COVID-19 . Jurnal Informasi Dan Teknologi, 4(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.37034/jidt.v4i1.170
Section
Articles

References

[1] Tim BPS Covid-19 Statistical Task Force, Hasil Survei Perilaku Masyarakat Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (7-14 September 2020), vol. 19, no. September. 2020.
[2] S. A. Soenarso and Handoyo, “Survei Markplus: Masyarakat enggan mengunjungi rumah sakit sejak pandemi Covid-19,” kontan.co.id, 2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/survei-markplus-masyarakat-enggan-mengunjungi-rumah-sakit-sejak-covid-19 (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).
[3] E. Laurenza, M. Quintano, F. Schiavone, and D. Vrontis, “The effect of digital technologies adoption in healthcare industry: a case based analysis,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1124–1144, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-04-2017-0084.
[4] M. Esposito, A. Minutolo, R. Megna, M. Forastiere, M. Magliulo, and G. De Pietro, “A smart mobile, self-configuring, context-aware architecture for personal health monitoring,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 67, pp. 136–156, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.09.019.
[5] Y. Zhao, Q. Ni, and R. Zhou, “What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 43, pp. 342–350, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006.
[6] D. H. Jaffe, L. Lee, S. Huynh, and T. P. Haskell, “Health Inequalities in the Use of Telehealth in the United States in the Lens of COVID-19,” Popul. Health Manag., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 368–377, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0186.
[7] S. Sadegh, P. Saadat, M. M. Sepehri, and V. Assadi, “A framework for m-health service development and success evaluation,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 112, pp. 123–130, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.003.
[8] A. Beratarrechea, A. G. Lee, J. M. Willner, E. Jahangir, A. Ciapponi, and A. Rubinstein, “The impact of mobile health interventions on chronic disease outcomes in developing countries: a systematic review,” Telemed. J. E. Health., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 75–82, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0328.
[9] L. Wallis, P. Blessing, M. Dalwai, and S. Do Shin, “Integrating mHealth at point of care in low- and middle-income settings: the system perspective.,” Glob. Health Action, vol. 10, no. sup3, p. 1327686, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1327686.
[10] A. Doshi, Y. Platt, J. R. Dressen, B. K. Mathews, and J. C. Siy, “Keep calm and log on: Telemedicine for COVID-19 pandemic response,” J. Hosp. Med., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 302–304, 2020, doi: 10.12788/jhm.3419.
[11] J. Vidal-Alaball et al., “Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Aten. primaria, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 418–422, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.04.003.
[12] B. A. Oktavira, “Aturan tentang Konsultasi Dokter Jarak Jauh (Telemedicine),” Klinik Hukumonline, Oct. 25, 2019. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5db2b3d5e618b/aturan-tentang-konsultasi-dokter-jarak-jauh-itelemedicine-i/ (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).
[13] E. Whaibeh, H. Mahmoud, and H. Naal, “Telemental Health in the Context of a Pandemic: the COVID-19 Experience,” Curr. Treat. options psychiatry, pp. 1–5, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40501-020-00210-2.
[14] R. A. Machado, N. L. de Souza, R. M. Oliveira, H. Martelli Júnior, and P. R. F. Bonan, “Social media and telemedicine for oral diagnosis and counselling in the COVID-19 era.,” Oral oncology, vol. 105. p. 104685, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104685.
[15] S. Reicher, T. Sela, and O. Toren, “Using Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Attitudes of Adult Health Care Consumers in Israel,” Front. Public Heal., vol. 9, no. May, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653553.
[16] A. Miyawaki, T. Tabuchi, M. K. Ong, and Y. Tsugawa, “Age and Social Disparities in the Use of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Cross-sectional Study.,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 23, no. 7, p. e27982, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.2196/27982.
[17] S. Orrange, A. Patel, W. J. Mack, and J. Cassetta, “Patient Satisfaction and Trust in Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study,” JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(2)e28589 https//humanfactors.jmir.org/2021/2/e28589, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e28589, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.2196/28589.
[18] M. Deidda, M. Meleddu, and M. Pulina, “Potential users’ preferences towards cardiac telemedicine: A discrete choice experiment investigation in Sardinia,” Heal. Policy Technol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 125–130, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.HLPT.2018.04.002.
[19] R. A. Neher, R. Dyrdak, V. Druelle, E. B. Hodcroft, and J. Albert, “Potential impact of seasonal forcing on a SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.,” Swiss Med. Wkly., vol. 150, p. w20224, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20224.
[20] E. K. Stokes et al., “Coronavirus Disease 2019 Case Surveillance - United States, January 22-May 30, 2020.,” MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., vol. 69, no. 24, pp. 759–765, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e2.
[21] D.-Q. Pham, S. A. Golub, C. C. Breuner, and Y. N. Evans, “The Impact of Telehealth on Clinical Education in Adolescent Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Positive Preliminary Findings,” Front. Pediatr., vol. 9, p. 210, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.642279.
[22] M. Hilbert, “Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics,” Womens. Stud. Int. Forum, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 479–489, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001.
[23] B. Gawronski and F. Strack, Eds., Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition - Google Books. New York: The Guiford Press, 2012.
[24] D. Albarracín and R. S. Wyer Jr., “The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions.,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, no. 1. American Psychological Association, US, pp. 5–22, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.5.
[25] J. A. Ouellette and W. Wood, “Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior.,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 124, no. 1. American Psychological Association, US, pp. 54–74, 1998, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54.